“When Viktor finally leaves the airport, with its multifarious communities and its pitfalls, he stays in New York for only a few hours; he has already seen America. He has even lived the American dream, found a job, earned money, seduced and lost a pretty woman, and he has become the hero of the terminal. Unlike Leonardo DiCaprio, who flitted from place to place following his every whim, Tom Hanks is forced to stay put, falling into the trap that this seemingly transparent world, with its glittering boutiques, put in his path, from slippery floor surfaces to deceptive panes of glass. Spielberg makes a direct contrast between the carefree 1960s, when people did not lock their doors, and the present-day sclerosis of America and its inward looking obsession with security, in a fable that is quietly savage, and more serious than it has been given credit for.”

Clelia Cohen gives a neat insight into the relationship between Catch Me If You Can and The Terminal in her book, Cahiers du Cinema Masters of Cinema - Steven Spielberg (page 86).

These two are some of Spielberg’s most rewarding and overlooked films, so it’s nice to see them given due analysis in this wonderful book.

“I have worked with many fine, wonderful actors who all bring different values to their characters. I have learned how they arrive at those very private and personal moments of consolidation where they are really able to imprint on a character, to deliver the message, convince us they are that person. Everybody has a different technique and I quite frankly don’t care how anybody gets to where they need to go. But I will say that I think Daniel and Tom Hanks are the two actors who I have had life-changing experiences with as a director.”

Spielberg on the “life-changing” experience of working with Daniel Day-Lewis and Tom Hanks.

Beautiful and rarely seen Japanese poster for The Terminal.

Beautiful and rarely seen Japanese poster for The Terminal.

“Ever feel like you’re just living in an airport?”

Trailer for The Terminal, one of Spielberg’s most under-rated films.

With the US election looming, I wanted to put together a little post on one of Spielberg’s most subtly political and under-rated films: The Terminal.
On the surface, The Terminal seems like a jolly caper starring Tom Hanks on top comic form, but dig a little deeper and there’s a lot more substance to it.
Made in 2004, The Terminal is a defence of immigration and a plea for the return of the American Dream in the post 9/11 dream. It finds Hanks’ Viktor Navorski arriving at JFK airport just as a violent revolution has taken place in his home country Krakozhia.
The revolution means Navorski’s passport is not valid, so he can’t enter America. He can’t leave either, so he is stuck in the airport with nothing but a small suitcase of luggage and a tin, which contains his late father’s collection of Jazz autographs. Viktor has come to America to get Benny Golson’s autograph and complete his father’s collection.
Viktor find himself trapped in the airport, a hell of clean, false whites and endless shops and superstores. It is an alien and alienating place, perfectly captured by Spielberg’s isolated long shots and Janusz Kaminski’s cold cinematography.
Viktor’s stay in the airport presents a problem for CBP Head Frank Dixon, who is on the verge of a promotion, but needs to find a way to get rid of Viktor. The two repeatedly butt heads, with Dixon doing everything in his power to abandon Viktor, no matter the cost.
What Spielberg presents then is an innocent lost boy who should find the protection he needs from a paternal America. Instead, he is manipulated and cheated by a beurocratic system that doesn’t care about his rights and needs, only in making money.
During his stay in the airport, Viktor becomes something of a self-made man. He finds a job helping construction workers and gradually starts to make enough money to eat and learn fluent English. He becomes, in other words, the living embodiment of the American Dream.
He also meets a group of other immigrants and minorities: Customs and Border Protection officer Dolores, catering car driver Enrique and janitor Gupta. He becomes their friend, and helps each one of them out, notably setting Dolores and Enrique up on a date. They later get married. 
Viktor becomes the comforting paternal figure that America should be, but isn’t. Yet he chooses not to stay. The film ends with Viktor escaping the airport and getting Golson’s autograph. His final line is to ask to be taken home.
I find The Terminal such a powerful film because behind the comedy, it contains a very explicit message about tolerance and communication. It insists that America’s cultural melting pot is not something to be feared (as it became after 9/11), but something to be embraced. It’s certainly something I’ve always admired about the States.
With the US seeming more conflicted about the major issues and divided by race and nationality than ever, I think The Terminal contains a vital message, one that I hope is heeded at the polling stations next week.

With the US election looming, I wanted to put together a little post on one of Spielberg’s most subtly political and under-rated films: The Terminal.

On the surface, The Terminal seems like a jolly caper starring Tom Hanks on top comic form, but dig a little deeper and there’s a lot more substance to it.

Made in 2004, The Terminal is a defence of immigration and a plea for the return of the American Dream in the post 9/11 dream. It finds Hanks’ Viktor Navorski arriving at JFK airport just as a violent revolution has taken place in his home country Krakozhia.

The revolution means Navorski’s passport is not valid, so he can’t enter America. He can’t leave either, so he is stuck in the airport with nothing but a small suitcase of luggage and a tin, which contains his late father’s collection of Jazz autographs. Viktor has come to America to get Benny Golson’s autograph and complete his father’s collection.

Viktor find himself trapped in the airport, a hell of clean, false whites and endless shops and superstores. It is an alien and alienating place, perfectly captured by Spielberg’s isolated long shots and Janusz Kaminski’s cold cinematography.

Viktor’s stay in the airport presents a problem for CBP Head Frank Dixon, who is on the verge of a promotion, but needs to find a way to get rid of Viktor. The two repeatedly butt heads, with Dixon doing everything in his power to abandon Viktor, no matter the cost.

What Spielberg presents then is an innocent lost boy who should find the protection he needs from a paternal America. Instead, he is manipulated and cheated by a beurocratic system that doesn’t care about his rights and needs, only in making money.

During his stay in the airport, Viktor becomes something of a self-made man. He finds a job helping construction workers and gradually starts to make enough money to eat and learn fluent English. He becomes, in other words, the living embodiment of the American Dream.

He also meets a group of other immigrants and minorities: Customs and Border Protection officer Dolores, catering car driver Enrique and janitor Gupta. He becomes their friend, and helps each one of them out, notably setting Dolores and Enrique up on a date. They later get married. 

Viktor becomes the comforting paternal figure that America should be, but isn’t. Yet he chooses not to stay. The film ends with Viktor escaping the airport and getting Golson’s autograph. His final line is to ask to be taken home.

I find The Terminal such a powerful film because behind the comedy, it contains a very explicit message about tolerance and communication. It insists that America’s cultural melting pot is not something to be feared (as it became after 9/11), but something to be embraced. It’s certainly something I’ve always admired about the States.

With the US seeming more conflicted about the major issues and divided by race and nationality than ever, I think The Terminal contains a vital message, one that I hope is heeded at the polling stations next week.

I’m a huge fan of The Terminal, a film that gets relatively little love from critics and Spielberg fans alike. It’s a shame that the picture is so undervalued, because it’s a smart and surprising take on America’s post-9/11 place in the world that, in one of the few glowing write-ups, was perfectly surmised by Empire Magazine’s Ian Nathan.

Arguing that the film is “unusual and elegant” and cemented Spielberg’s place as “the most unpredictable director in Hollywood”, Nathan writes:

“…Steven Spielberg, in later career, is having a whale of a time mixing up his native crowdpleasing with a caustic independent spirit. Yes, The Terminal is funny, romantic and sentimental, but inside Spielberg’s purpose-built airport lounge, an open-plan cathedral of endless flux, he’s channelling both Capra and Kafka. This is a post-millennial fable about how the world really kinda sucks.”

Capra meets Kafka? I can’t think of a better way to sum up this wonderful, soulful little gem of a film.